LETTER: ‘Why Annexation of White Center Should Not Be Put On Ballot’

10 Reasons Why The Annexation of Area Y/White Center Should Not Be Put On The Ballot

1. The Sales Tax Credits from the state have not come through to support the annexation of this area. There is no money. And even if the monies came through they are still not enough to support Area Y annually. Area Y will cost in excess of $5 million dollars to support and Burien does not have that money. One of the major writers of the Draft Berk Report did not even show up to the Boundary Review Board to speak about his report because the report is economically non-defensible. Members of the Boundary Review Board openly commented that the math in the report did not add up. All that Mike Martin and the Burien Finance Director could mumble into the microphones was that this was only a guess report. (Source: Boundary Review meeting minutes).

2. According to the Burien Comprehensive Plan, the City Council is not allowed to do anything thing that violates this plan. The Burien Comprehensive Plan clearly states that an election vote on the annexation of Area Y is not allowed until the City has a clear business plan for how the services and capital needs of the annexed area can be funded over time-for a period of 10 to 20 years. (Source: The Burien Comprehensive Plan, page 2-39). Burien has no business plan for the area.

3. The city promised that there would be an agreement between the fire districts before any further steps on annexation proceeded. Currently there is no agreement between these two districts and one of the districts has opposed the annexation because it will leave them millions of dollars short. This means increased taxes for the citizens of Burien to fund this shortfall of monies to the fire districts. Perhaps the fire district is too frightened to say too much about this because it is building a fire station. Perhaps it is afraid that by talking too much, it will make it next to impossible to get building permits from the city/City Manager to complete the fire station on time and within costs. (See the presentation at the November, 2011 City Council meeting by the Fire District).

4. There are not enough monies in the plan/report to adequately fund police services to the Area Y. Burien does not even have enough monies to fund police for the current city. That is why Mike Martin is going to try and get a new tax/levy on the ballot in August, 2012 of this year to fund his so called “Cops and Kids Initiative”. He does not have the adequate amount of money to fund the amount of police protection Burien currently needs and he has not correctly predicted the amount of money that will be needed for police service to Area Y. Each property owner in Burien would be required to pay more on their taxes ($200 per month or per year?) to fund this initiative to pay for police services that Burien cannot currently afford.

5. At the end of 10 years, Burien will not be able to support Area Y. It will have a budget shortfall in excess of $5 million dollars (Source: Draft Berk Report).

6. Area Y has at least $77 million dollars in infrastructure repairs-streets, storm water repairs, etc.-that Burien will inherit with the area and cannot afford to pay for. This amount of repairs and money needed has been confirmed by the King County Roads assessment for the Area Y. The citizens of Burien will be responsible for this debt and these repairs. Should annexation go through, in the first year alone, $5 million dollars will have to go immediately-as highest priority to Area Y. And, none of the annual $5 million of sales tax credits can be used to cover these costs. This means that Area X and the rest of the City will not get the repairs that they so desperately need. (Source: King County Report on storm water problems in the county).

7. Burien does not have enough money to fund Human Services, Legal Services, Senior Services and Animal Control to Area Y. Someone will have to pay for these which will only be affordable through increased taxes to Burien residents. King County will not help Burien with these costs. (Source: Boundary Review Board hearings).

8. Property values have dropped drastically for both Burien and Area Y. Burien will take in less revenue to run the city in the next couple of years to run even the current city. (Source: 3/14/2012 presentation by Lloyd Hara/King County Assessor).

9. The Unincorporated North Highline Council (UNHAC) which regularly comes to speak at the Burien City Council Meeting and supports annexation does not represent the views of the majority of the people in Area Y. They represent the views of less than 1% of the people in Area Y. According to King County records, these representatives are elected to their positions by only 2 to 20 voters in the Area Y. So why is Mike Martin and the Burien City Council constantly catering to this small group? Jerry Robison claims to be the founding leader of this group (UNHAC).

10. 2000 Burien citizens signed a petition to not annex Area X to the City of Burien-more than voted in the elections for the UNHAC-and the City Council has ignored their voice. The local Burien media sources say that in their informal surveys on annexation, citizens of Burien oppose the annexation of Area Y by 2 to 1. Their readership is 50,000 to 75,000 readers per week. Jerry Robison-Burien City Council member-supports this annexation because he has stated that he wants the annexation of Area Y to be his only, personal legacy as a council person to Burien. (Source: Burien City Council retreat, January, 2012). It appears he has absolutely no concern over the economics. He did not put on his campaign literature that he was for annexation because he was afraid that he would lose to his opponent-and he would have.

The Burien City Council needs to hear from you during their Monday night council meeting-March 19, 2012, 7:00 PM, Burien City Hall. Annexation of Area Y should not be put on the ballot. It makes no economic sense for the citizens of Burien or for the citizens of Area Y. It only strokes the ego of a few people who are politically ambitious or who are hoping to make some real estate profits. It has nothing whatsoever to do with schools or libraries. Both of those topics have been pumped up a red herring stories to try to scare people to support annexation. What happens to school and libraries will not be affected by annexing or not annexing Area Y. King County has confirmed that once that once the council votes on to be put on the ballot, it is a difficult process to be it off the ballot. Burien should not put the annexation of Area Y on the ballot.

– John and Linda Poitras

[Have something you’d like to share with our 50,000+ Readers? Please send us your Letter to the Editor via email. Include your full name, and, pending our review, we’ll most likely publish it.]


4 Responses to “LETTER: ‘Why Annexation of White Center Should Not Be Put On Ballot’”
  1. mike says:

    I’d like to see BTB and WCB put up a poll on annexation. One for Burien residents, one for Area Y residents.

  2. BlairJ says:

    I’d like to see the poll that Mike suggests include all the options:
    (1) join Burien, (2) join Seattle, (3) remain unincorporated, (4) form a new city.
    Yes, the last two are unlikely, but it would be valuable to see how many still want one of those options. It would also be worthwhile to understand the geographical distribution of responses to the four options. The Seattle City Council has said they “would not stand in the way” of Burien’s annexation of the area, but they also have left the door open for annexing the remaining area if it does not get annexed to Burien.

  3. In reading the above comments I still see a lot of backward thinking and self interests. There are some problems with annexation of area Y that need attention but there are many that have been addressed and not listened to by the people against annexation. One comment it that the HUAC was voted in by a small number of votes. Whose fault is that. THE VOTERS! Every time there was an election is was published in all of the local news papers and the Seattle papers. Also notices were placed ion the bulletin boards at all the libraries in the area and the supper markets. All the publicity for the elections was put out in a timely manor but very few voters took up their right to vote. HOW DO YOU FORCE PEOPLE TO VOTE. Even in National elections it is hard to get the voters out. Having spent many hours working with the council to get the voters out and the short response is not conductive of the system. If the complainers of the vote has any idea how to get the voters to respond I would like to hear it. Also they complain about costs in the area 10 years down the road. Well if Burien has been doing any planning for 10 years down the road (which I doubt) then the problem would be the same for the present Burien citizens. If the newly annexated area of Burien and the people of the present area Y did not shop in Burien then Burien would be in a great deal of trouble. Sales tax wise and lack of support to their shops and businesses. If all these people decided that Burien was not worth the trouble to support then Burien as they now stand would be really in a huruing position. The people on North Highline would like to stay the way things are but the Sate of Washington has passed a law that makes this impossible. Therefore we must campane for annexation some place. and main reason Burien has gotten their attention is that even when unicoorpirated, the North Highline area kind of considered themselves a part of Burien, Also the forward thinking people on your city convcil can see far enough down the road problems that annexation would help , improve or ellimiate. You complainers act lke the annex supporters have something personal to gain which is false. If over the course of history the complainers were in charge there would be no Golden Gate Bridge, Few paved roads and no public education. The country would be very backword from what it is today. The Burien voters voted out Mr Shaw because he was able to think ahead and thought that annexation was to the advantage of the community of Burien. Many of your many improvements were caused by his support when on the city planning board. But now you have several council people who cannot think very far ahead and that in a long run could cause problems or down fall. Just try and think of all the trouble that the forward thinkers on your city staff and council have done to improve your city and you had better hope they continue to think ahead. Thanks Bob Price

  4. Tired of the lies says:

    And just wait this supposive levy for more officers boils down to you guessed it even more taxes! This has been the bigest joke all along we have been telling people that the taxes will skyrocket and they have! Start asking local comercial property owners in the new Burien anexed areas how they trippled there values and they are now paying three times the taxes ROFL suckers!!!! What happened to saving money hahahaa if you all believe the Gastapo at Burien city council your fools. Just wait till these groups start to speak up and all the lies come forth. Shame on you Burien City Council

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!